To many members of the public, streaking students are viewed as an abnormality at best, and a nuisance at worst. However, I believe that streaking students should deserve severe and cruel punishments for their most heinous crimes.
Fellow students, have you ever experienced that burning urge, after every exam, test and graded assignment, to take off all your clothes and dash around the school compounds? No? This, friends, is because of the stable sanity level of one’s brain. Generally, the saner one is, the less rashly one is prone to act. For example, insane people like to keep long hair and shout antiestablishment messages randomly in the streets. The reason why this act is rash and therefore insane is because it can in no way help the person doing it, but would probably do him all types of harm. Streaking is another symptom of insanity, for most corporations do not hire employees based on how aesthetically pleasing they look running stark naked: indeed, streaking will likely land you in a bad spot, as no one, not teachers, not managers, not even fellow students (most fellow students, anyway), likes to see unclothed youths frolicking. It would probably hurt your chance of getting employed - not that you have such a good chance in the first place, anyway.
Certain antisocial hippies masquerading as students claim that streaking has never harmed anyone before. Their sorry excuse of an argument is that famous schools the likes of UCLA do not punish its students for streaking; indeed, in those schools, streaking has more or less become a tradition there. They then further their presumptuous claims by saying that the authorities tolerate or even support such events. This, as I hardly need to point out, is illogical: such schools as UCLA resides in the fabled lands of the West. The students studying in those schools are worlds apart, both in culture and in mentality, from us Asiatics. Values of the West and the East probably cannot co-exist peacefully, unless one side owes the other three or four trillion dollars. Western concepts such as democracy, for example, work disastrously in the East. Eastern concepts, such as despotism, for example, work disastrously in the West. The ‘tradition’ of streaking will not be much different.
Finally, streaking students should be punished severely because of their potential to degrade the scores of their fellow students and upset the psychology of the teachers, which everyone knows are…delicate…to begin with. Imagine you, a teacher, strolling happily to your staffroom after a long and arduous term, full of benevolence and warm bubbly love, ready to take a cup of coffee to unwind before marking your students’ scripts. Then imagine some of those very same students, of whom you have been thinking such fond thoughts of, suddenly rushing past you down to the school hall in underwears and socks. Everywhere around you, you hear the derogative titter of the students, the contemptuous, condescending tone of your colleagues, who, while shaking their heads, wonders aloud which teacher had taught those clots. A few tentative fingers point your way; soon, all eyes stare accusingly at your squirming, writhing back. All your fond thoughts vanish. A bitter, cynical anger burns within you. Swiftly, you began to mutate into the vicious, nit-picking teacher you were so disparaging of in primary school. Every test you mark inadvertently fails. Every student you speak to runs away screaming and suffers nightmares every other night. Thus, with this vivid and life-like example, I hope to have convinced you of not being overly lenient, or indeed lenient at all, towards any streaking students.
In conclusion, I round off by saying that streaking students, who contributes absolutely nothing to society, and would probably degenerate it – and you – drastically, ought to be faced with the most dreadful castigation possible.
-- Wang YiHua (29)
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I don't really agree with your 'teacher' example. It's just quite an extreme case. Most people will dismiss your speech quickly if you have such weird examples. No offense meant. ;)
ReplyDeleteGood use of humour at the start but quickly get into the main content to avoid losing your audience.
However, I do not agree with the sanity bit too. cos it's a bit far-fetched though....
you may want to consider the examples you use but points are ok
If as you said, they are "insane", shouldnt they be let off for being mentall unstable? Interesting perspective of the issue.. but certainly too exaggerated. Perhaps you might want to adopt a milder tone.
ReplyDeleteNice use of analogies. Very interesting. But a too harsh tone might put off your target audience.
I contend that rash acts are not necessarily insane - the streaking students were drunk, by the way, which is why they appear to be 'out of their minds' , and you perhaps try to link streaking with insanity on links too tenuous/not enough proof. However the use of humour is very effective in keeping the reader engaged and interested.
ReplyDeleteSigh...my whole commentary was an ode to sarcasm. I KNOW that my tone was too exaggerated and stuff; I'll obviously make my tone more mild in the graded test.
ReplyDelete